Science and art realigning? For a long time I have thought of the
disconnect between the majority of Americans and the scientific
community. There is a general and apparent sense of fear about science
and
technology misapplied. I am not arguing that this paranoia is
completely unwarranted but that it causes some to throw the proverbial baby out with the bathwater
when it
comes to applying technologies to this thing we call
human life. In this article Peter Forbes writing for the Times Online
describes a current trend in science writing - artistic individuals compelled to write about scientific themes. This may be the end of
what I call the "Burning Windmill".
To me the image of a burning
windmill represents the moment the masses pass judgmental on
emerging scientific technologies. The image came to me while watching the original Boris Karloff black and white version of Frankenstein.
In the end the monster is chased by the mob to a tower, which
is in fact a windmill. Here the people decide the most appropriate course
of action is to kill him, burn him in the windmill. The movie ends
before we see proof of his charred body and in this indefinite passing of time I see an uncertainty.
A persistent uneasy feeling held by civilization since
the publication of Mary Shelly's Frankenstein in 1818. Will the firemen
show up and put out the flames or will the angry mob successfully
extinguish the experiment. How can the citizenry keep the application
of science in check? How can we prevent the misapplication of
technology without behaving like the mob at the windmill or the
mob that carved the flesh from Hypatia with abalone shells?
Further in the article
Forbes talks about the healing process between the
infamous "two cultures" of science and humanities. The first
step for any individual taking on a healing or reckoning path is
acknowledging fear. The fear that "although science may be powerfully
predictive, it threatens to undermine the beliefs and intuitions we
uphold to make life tolerable; We fear we may learn something we would
rather not know”.
While ruminating on these concepts my mind kept floating back to the desert, peering into the world of Edward Abbey where he has an epiphany - how he feels about science and technology. His words are an excellent foothold to begin reconciliation between the two cultures. In Desert Solitaire Abbey is philosophizing with a visitor to Arches in the chapter Episodes and Visions and realizes he is...
"not opposed to
mankind but only to man-centeredness, anthropocentricity, the opinion
that the world exists solely for the sake of man; not to science, which
means simply knowledge, but to science misapplied, to the worship of
technique and technology, and to that perversion of science properly
called scientism; and not to civilization but to culture."
No comments:
Post a Comment