Thursday, October 7, 2010

"The Misadventures of the Romantic Cannibals"

Montana Woman Destroys Controversial Art. 

[Loveland, Colorado] The woman has been identified as 56-year-old Kathleen Folden - a truck driver from Kalispell, Montana.   One of the frantic museum curators told me she smuggled a crowbar into the museum wrapped in her sweater.  The panel on the lower right of the series pictured below was the piece that moved her to vandalism. Entitled - "The Misadventures of the Romantic Cannibals" the piece was composed by Enrique Chagoya while master print maker Bud Shark produced this iteration. Though the damaged art was removed by police there are many other pieces still on display at the Gallery Museum on the North West Corner of Lincoln and 5th Street in Loveland.  Many prints are arranged in three dimensions and are extremely engaging.  My favorite is a piece entitled "Frontier Justice."


Exhibit A:  The display after Kathleen Folden made her "modification."

When asked by Fox News about  the vandalism of his art Enrique Chagoya responded eloquently.
"Should we as artists, or any free-thinking people, have to be subjected to fear of violent attacks for expressing our sincere concerns? I made a collage with a comic book and an illustration of a religious icon to express the corruption of something precious and spiritual.
There is no nudity, or genitals, or explicit sexual contact shown in the image. There is a dressed woman, a religious icon's head, a man showing his tongue, and a skull of a Pope in the upper right corner of the controversial page. I did not make a picture of Christ. I used symbols as one would use words in a sentence to critique corruption of the sacred by religious institutions."




Loveland Mayor Cecil Gutierrez stands with a local police officer in the lobby of the Museum Gallery. He had a nervous look on his face as he texted frantically.  For me it was a happy introduction to this place there is an amazing sculpture mimicking Picasso's tormented "Guernica"  made from old car hoods in the lobby as well. I would not have been aware of the deep significance of Guernica were it not my philosophical experience discussing this piece while blogging about the World Science Festival in New York City this past June.



I purchased a free-expression souvenir!

Evolutiuon of Morality - a facebook thread

The following lines were composed by Jake - a person I have never met other than through a random facebook friend. These thoughts were provoked by a comment thread.  I will highlight his argument in crimson. My rebuttals are in black.
Jake: I want to argue why Natural selection (NS) cannot be the product of morality. In the following, I will not attempt to defend my own views on the source of morality – though I will later if anyone is interested.

If NS is the driving force ...behind the theory of evolution, meaning that Darwinists must confine their arguments and your view of humans, human actions, and human motivation to that of NS. I agree that NS exists in many species, but humans do not operate SOLELY on NS. Here is why.
I'd like to be civil here. Please Jake don't call me a "Darwinist."  You don't call someone a Newtonist when they accept the theory of gravity so please, though you may think it a appropriate, do not do this. It is mildly offensive.  One does not have to agree with every word a person from history ever uttered to accept some of their ideas.  

Jake:  Cannot Define Culture:
Kristopher, you argued that morality has evolved in order to preserve culture, which helps individual survival. The problem with that argument is that if we even attempt to define culture, Darwinism breaks down. 1) If we define culture on a small scale (My son and I), then no one will care, due to NS, if I kill the bullies that pick on him at school. Because of NS and my duty to survive my little culture, then it’s ok for me to eliminate ANY competition or harm that my son may face. I think it’s safe to assume however, that most people on this thread will not support me on my endeavor to keep my son out of harm’s way by killing off my son’s peers.

I apologize for my choice of words. The way I phrased it it does sound like I am  saying there is some higher purpose to evolution.  There is none, not even preservation of culture.  Thinking that evolution has an ultimate goal, an apex, a mountain top it is striving to summit, is the most common misconception about evolution. This misconception may seem harmless but is actually the same misconception that Nazis had thinking that they could in fact breed a superior race.  Their certainty in the "ascending nature of evolution"  guided them. There is NO ascension, only a series of equilibria.

You are simplifying in your above paragraph Jake.  But I will entertain your scenario and maintain that NS would eventually select against your "ruthless" proposal.  By killing any being that threatens your child you are actually endangering both yourself and your child based on the inevitable enemies you would make. 
Jake: But Darwinists are restricted to NS and laws of survival and thus cannot argue against their own mode of operation. That would contradict Darwinism. 2) If we define culture on a large scale (humanity), NS as humanity’s mechanism for survival also falls apart – it’s contradictory. If I care more about humanity’s survival over my own, then I am denying my own pursuit to survive by working against the very mechanism that makes me human.
The scale at which NS operates is NOT the species as a group, it is not even the individual organism, it is the individual genes within said organism.  Genes are shared among family. Our organism-operating  instincts for immediate altruism derive from our shared genes. Though your neighbor may share very few genes with you you will still feel altruistic towards him or her because of these default programs operating constitutively.    Oh yeah, genes are also shared between species!
Jake: If I allow other humans to survive over myself, then I am clearly not operating from NS or survival of the fittest, but I am operating according to some unexplainable greater good. Also, what would be the point in caring for other species? Why not take all the dogs at the pound, who take up time and resources, behind the building and shoot them in the head? Why sacrifice our resources for the survival of other species? But I once read an atheist’s approval of Kant’s quote, “We can judge the heart of a man by his treatment of animals.” 3) If we go more moderately and define culture as race or nation, then none within each culture, race, or nation should care if another culture, race, or nation is blown off the map. But most people do! I will also assume that most people on this thread are opposed to racism, genocide, and eugenics - But Darwinists are restricted to NS and laws of survival and thus cannot operate against their own mode of operation. That would contradict Darwinism.
"Why not take all the dogs at the pound, who take up time and resources, behind the building and shoot them in the head? "  

Jake!  Are you kidding?  Dogs are domesticated animals!  Meaning they have been going through human guided selection.  See how long a grizzly bear would last in an average household with babies present!  We DO shoot millions of dogs in the head in the US and around the world every day, if they happen to be born with a few too many of those aggressive genes showing up in their phenotype.  This is human guided selection because we like dogs for companionship, exercise, relaxation,  and the list goes on. But if a dog were to kill a human baby you bet that dog would be put down and their genes removed from the pool! There is a great chapter in the " the Greatest Show on Earth" that lays out the co-evolution of dogs with humans from the time they were simply curious wolves.    
Jake: Darwinism Cannot Explain:
Compassion: How is compassion explained by Darwinian evolution when life is all about the survival of the fittest? Most of us clearly see, understand, and give compassion, but compassion contradicts NS and survival of the fittest because why would a “fit” human sacrifice time, energy, resources, and sometimes their own life for the survival of the “unfit?”
Please desist with the "survival of the fittest" -  social-Darwinism propaganda!  It is 2010 not 1890!!!


Compassion does NOT contradict natural selection! The more up-to-date terminology you are groping for here is "survival of the most well adapted to specific environmental niches" we have seen this over and over in the observation of compassionate creatures all over the globe and testing different survival strategies in computer simulation.  If you want your genes to endure down through the generations being nasty is NOT a long term option. 
Jake: Monogamy: If most species are polygamists, then why are many humans (I recognize not all) monogamists? By Darwinian definition, we should all be polygamists. Is any girl out there cool with their boyfriend having multiple girlfriends? If we are a product of Darwinian evolution, you shouldn’t care.
Please list for me all the families you know where not one parent, grandparent, great grandparent or great-great grandparent did not produce offspring with more than one mate?   Human society is in polygamy denial along with overall biological denial brought on by religious guilt. Humans currently mask polygamous mating strategies by practicing serial monogamy!  So God can still love them :) There are some clear biological benefits to monogamy, namely that you know your energy in child rearing is actually being devoted to your genetic offspring and not some genetic freeloader.  But that happens too :(. 
Jake: Why survival is good in the first place: Darwinists see that all of life can be described and explained through science, but science can only explain the way things ARE. Science, Darwinism, and NS cannot account for the way things SHOULD BE. Why then, is survival a “good” thing in the first place? Why should we survive? 

This is a really good question, the best one in your series.  I think defining the answer to this question is up to US as critically thinking people able to communicate.  It is TOO EASY to assign the answer to some uncommunicative deity. It is up to humans to answer this question not imaginary sky-fathers!
Jake: A world where NS is the primary working mechanism for humans, would look like…? If we only operate from NS, as Darwinism defines us, then what would our world look like? People obviously do bad things and people obviously do good things, but if we were rooted in NS, then humans would be at their worst.
That is your opinion!  With your late 19th century definition of NS, yeah maybe people would be at their worst. But collective understanding of NS has come to encompass compassion and altruism and will be essential to implement if we as a global community are going to hope to make it through times of resources scarcity, as I think we are rapidly approaching. 
Jake: Polygamy: Is anyone ok with polygamy? Most species are polygamists, but many humans are not, so what makes us different? Polygamy would give me more offspring, and thus would give my offspring the best chance for survival, so why are many people opposed to it? If we are all rooted in NS, then we should all, by definition and like most other species, be polygamists.
See above critique of monogamy.
Jake:  Infanticide: Killing off unwanted offspring; deformed or female offspring. This was a common practice in ancient cultures, but most people are against it these days, but by definition, we should all be participants in infanticide. If all species are rooted in NS, then we should be like Hive-bees and not think twice, but how many people would think it ok to be like bees who “kill their brothers, and mothers… (and) strive to kill their fertile daughters.” Or what about Lions? When taking over a foreign pride, they kill off the fertile males to eliminate competition for survival and offspring. But why are most people not ok when it happens among humans? But aren’t we all rooted in survival of the fittest and NS?
Again compassion is beneficial to a single gene's survival! Reducing human suffering is ultimately compassionate. This is where major disagreements on human morality happen. Not with infanticide because at an early stage it is hard to tell if a certain genetic condition is causing severe suffering or not.  If a human can get to an age of reason and decide that their life is just way too painful and hard they should be allowed to take their own life in my opinion.  But it should be THEIR decision.  Have you seen the film "the sea inside?" As a society we have plenty of resources to go around to keep people healthy and alive until age or chance takes them out. other people should have nothing to do with those decisions.  I.E. Terri Schiavo. 
Jake:  Racism/Genocide/Eugenics: Darwin was a racist – read Descent of Man, a very embarrassing work for Darwinists. I quote an article: “Darwin tried to determine whether human races should be considered distinct species. In the end, he was unsure whether to rank the races ‘as species or sub-species’ but finally asserted that ‘the latter term appears the most appropriate…’ Whether races are species or sub-species, it is easy to see how such reasoning allowed Darwin to rank the races on an evolutionary scale. Because natural selection must be the cause of the existence of different races, Darwin argued that the various races would necessarily have varying intellectual and moral capacities. So that, for example, the ‘American aborigines, Negroes, and Europeans differ as much from each other in mind as any three races that can be named.’ As we have seen, the Europeans came out on top… ‘The civilized races of man will almost certainly exterminate and replace throughout the world the savage races. At the same time the anthropomorphous apes . . . will no doubt be exterminated. The break will then be rendered wider, for it will intervene between man in a more civilized state, as we may hope . . . the Caucasian, and some ape as low as a baboon, instead of as at present between the Negro or Australian and the gorilla.’” Hitler, Stalin, Mao, and Pol Pot all thought along the lines of “Survival of the Fittest,” and that cannot be argued. They were the “fit” and they were taking out the competition for survival, ie the “unfit.” In a Darwinist society, genocide should have no moral opponents.
Darwin was born the exact year and date as Abraham Lincoln - February 12th 1809.

Listen to what our great President Lincoln said on September 18th 1858 (the year before Darwin published on the Origin of Species) 
"I will say then that I am not, nor ever have been in favor of bringing about in anyway the social and political equality of the white and black races - that I am not nor ever have been in favor of making voters or jurors of negroes, nor of qualifying them to hold office, nor to intermarry with white people; and I will say in addition to this that there is a physical difference between the white and black races which I believe will forever forbid the two races living together on terms of social and political equality. And inasmuch as they cannot so live, while they do remain together there must be the position of superior and inferior, and I as much as any other man am in favor of having the superior position assigned to the white race. I say upon this occasion I do not perceive that because the white man is to have the superior position the negro should be denied everything."
Yes I agree with you, Darwin can be considered a racist by modern definitions. But we are talking about a mind that was born 200 years ago!   Unlike "religionists" I do not take everything someone says and consider it "sacred" I scrutinize what they said, take it in the context of the time-period they were speaking, and accept what remains my own tests.   I can accept the Pythagorean theorem and not believe humans come from pea pods as Pythagoras and his numbers-cult asserted!

As for the frontal lobe argument, there certainly are connections with biology and the ability to perform/recognize right and wrong. However, not being able to separate the two does not negate the existence of right and wrong. If I have facial aphasia (a condition when a person cannot recognize faces and facial features), just because I might not be able to recognize Adrienne’s face does not mean that Adrienne isn’t there. The same is true with objective morality.

Morality cannot be an evolutionary product. There are too many holes in its proposition and even when it does not hurt us (and even when it would benefit our survival) we squirm with discomfort when someone does something immoral.
Yes, I squirm too but it is by INSTINCT! :)

Sunday, October 3, 2010

Michael Steele Promotes GOP Gerrymandering

Yes, I ventured into the belly of the beast!

Arriving in a giant red tour bus with the words "Need a job? Fire Peolsi" painted on the side, Republican National Committee Chair Michael Steele spoke at the GOP "victory center" in Fort Collins, CO Thursday September 30th, 2010.

Though Steele repeated how happy he was to see such "young" energy at headquarters the handful of teens and twenty-something college republicans were outnumbered ten-to-one by straw-hat, "don't tread on me" t-shirt-wearing retirees. Not more than one hundred folks showed up for the rally. Here is a clip of Steele stumping for local candidates, most of whom physically distanced themselves from the controversial Chairman.




In case you missed that button!

Coordinating the event was Chelsey Penoyer - Press Aide & Office Manager to the Colorado Republican Committee.


I've run into this cast of characters before. Below is Ed Haynes. Ironic that he is here cheering for Steele while he was forced to resign as Larimer County GOP chair after using a racial slur during a public opinion hearing regarding freedom of the press in the fall of 2007.  Start watching this video at 52 minutes in to see what I'm talking about.


To me the scariest character, at this meeting was Scott Gessler - currently running for Secretary of State for Colorado.  I personally spoke with Scott for about 10 minutes before Steele began his pep talk.  Gessler frightens me because it seems that he wants to redraw the electoral districts to favor republicans. As secretary of State he would have this power.  He has also made it his mission to keep Acorn OUT of Colorado.  Yeah that's just what this state needs - to keep disenfranchised voters disenfranchised.  Gessler was one of two candidates that physically positioned himself near the Chairman during the event. 
The other was Sue Sharky, pictured below. She is running to be elected to the board of regents.  She railed against the high cost of higher education in Colorado while simultaneously advocating tax cuts and, in turn, budget cuts for higher education in Colorado.  She made a point of decrying the fact that 90% of professors at CU are registered Democrats. Coincidence? 


Friday, October 1, 2010

PhD TV - Hot Research

PHD Tales from the Road - NMSU's Chile Pepper Institute from PHD Comics on Vimeo.

Nature Podcast - River Controversy

This week's Nature podcast is EXCELLENT! The segment starting at 8:24 in is highly relevant to those arguing to stop the Glade reservoir project in Larimer County, CO. See Save the Poudre.

Tuesday, September 28, 2010

Friday, September 24, 2010

Tuesday, September 21, 2010

Pope Blames Atheists for Holocaust!

Did you see this news? As soon as the Pope stepped off the plane on his recent visit to Scotland he immediately attacked atheists blaming them for the holocaust! In so doing Joseph Ratzinger denies factual history.

Posting this may make me look like an insensitive jerk but I will not stand by while FLAT OUT LIES are pontificated by a human being who has been elevated by a splinter of humanity (the clergy) to  a position "above" the rest of us. I hold high the enlightenment ideal that EVERY MAN WOMAN AND CHILD ever to draw breath on this earth is born with the SAME freedom.


Monday, September 20, 2010

Hite Rising



Long after sunset on a Thursday night in early November we begin a westward pilgrimage to Abbey country. For three days my housemate Pat and I leave Fort Collins, Colorado to immerse ourselves in Ed’s old stomping grounds. Most time will pass in silence as the force of stratified sandstone reflecting sun arrests our thoughts, gives us the impression we are floating just above the surface of Neptune.

A washed moon in a bath of blue looks down on us after a night under the stars surrounded by Utah's flora, the Juniper and prickly pear. Coffee perks on the wisperlite as we pack up tents and sleeping pads on a sandy BLM road next to a “no camping” sign just north of Moab, UT.  A short trip southwest along the Colorado River with fluorescent tamarisk whipping by the open car windows, we pull up the gravel road to the Poison Spider trailhead. We fill water bottles and begin a day pedaling up red sandstone. The first week of November is the ideal time to visit Moab. Not too cold not too hot and the sky remains clear through the night. 

Pat and I normally ride in Fort Collins in jeans and sweatshirts, we are not what you’d call “shinys.” Not geared-out. Not knowing what to expect from this trail and with no body armor we are here for the serene not the extreme, not to “push ourselves” not to “feel the burn.” The day is invigorating and we pump up the loose sandy trail for miles, without company, feeling our hearts beat and listening to our breath. We see slivers of the muddy waters of the Colorado River its width shrinking as we ascend. This is why we came. 

We stop for rest and water near a gnarled but upright juniper, deep soft shaded sand helping us cool. We half expect to hear a Ute chanting from beneath the shadows of the frayed wood. An imagined vibration holds us in stillness. As we crest the trail and look out over the lumpy orange slit canyons a buzzing sound breaks the silence. 



Our first encounter with motorized vehicles. 

Three dirt bikes and two four wheelers, gentlemen out for a jolly good time in the hills. We breath their smoke do the civil hand waves and pedal on. Periodically more dirt bikes buzz past as we try loosing ourselves off the trail. These initial reminders of industrialized leisure didn’t get to me right away. I was happy to let them by so I could return to silent meditation floating on air encased in rubber and metal but when we approached "little" arch I lost it inside. By this point the trail was blackened by rubber left by heavy vehicles that daily careen around the Moab badlands. The slickrock terrain, the rounded red mounds peppered with shadow, dryed pinyon and juniper, sage, yellow-green shocks of rabbit-brush and cactus blossoms are diminished by these black lines. The tracks smell of vulcanization agent - sulfur’s diabolical association. Ol’ Mr. Goodyear is poking his finger up my nose in the middle of the serene desert atmosphere. This distraction is made more real as a caravan of hummers glimmering metallic neon, GOP red, Wal-mart blue, and taco bell purple paint jobs cresting the slickrock hill south of little arch grinding their rubber into the grit. Hulking and cumbersome they begin their descent as we begin our nimble human-powered ascent. From the back seat a pale passenger glances at us over her sunglasses as she gulps bottled water listening to generic 80’s rock. I feel the anger of Abbey rising in my forearms. They swell and my knuckles whiten as I fantasize about playing chicken with these machines. The hummers transform into large predators crushing frail sagebrush under their opulent undersides. I envision jumping from my bicycle onto the hood of the lead vehicle, ripping it off and tearing out the oil lines. I see myself shapeshifiting into a momma bear full of protective power roaring and spraying the passengers with that black liquid until they wilt like the seagulls in the Gulf of Mexico. I return to my eyes from fantasy-land and my heart is pounding as I swerve to the right to miss the leader by 30 feet. I am filled with enough residual adrenaline to power up a portion of the trail I would otherwise have to walk. I stop at the top winded and waiting for Pat to pass the motorcade. We look back at them and shake our heads. Despite the seething feelings it is less than 30 minutes now before we get to the pinnacle of the trail - the overlook of the Colorado River and Moab at the turnoff to the portal trail. 

Slowly descending the angular crags of fractured sandstone blocks, my heart is refilled with happiness as we round a bend to the flaming glory of the Colorado River. The portal trail is inaccessible to four-wheeled vehicles. The cottonwoods ablaze with color as the 4 o’clock sun irradiates their leaves reflecting only the yellow part of the rainbow, chlorophyll gone it is the carotenoids and flavanoids filling these leaves with a golden hue. The splendor of the river in autumn should be added as a verse of “America the Beautiful” - this scene should be on currency. 

In Desert Solitaire Abbey suggests that the national parks be made accessible only by government issued bicycles. After traveling to Zion national park and seeing the bus system run people up the canyon I have witnessed firsthand how limiting motorized vehicle access to natural spaces does indeed amplify a visitor’s experience. And today I see the opposite is true. My experience on this first day of the pilgrimage brings me closer to the preservationist in Abbey. Though the spirit calling us from the dried desert wood may have brought us here, one word alone written over and over in the collected works of Edward Abbey inspired this particular pilgrimage  - “Hite…” 



Herein lies the value of naming things be they magpie, prickly pear, tourmaline, or Cincinnati. I am Kristopher, son of Ronald who was given his genetic constitution and his last name, Hite, from his father - Ross or Roswell Neil Hite born around 1900 in Bucyrus Ohio. Little  is known about this man as he disappeared in the early 1930's. 

I am convinced, both by studying genetics and observing simultaneous generations of single families that we share, not just physical but BEHAVIORAL traits with our ancestors. We are each a stochastic mixture of the information housed in each of our four grandparents, eight great grandparents, and 16 great greats and so on back through the eons.  For me these observations have not been possible as I never met my grandfather.  This circumstance has rendered me unusually curious about any hint of a genealogical connection and Edward Abbey provided me with a burst of energy.

It turns out that my family name i.e. my genes have been dancing around this country since 1709 the first one to come over was Jost Hite. A German who brought his large family to the Shenandoah valley in present day Virginia. There are many stories of Hite’s in the west throughout American history. Alongside Jesse James rode Sherwood Hite an ally of Jesse and part of the gang. In fact, the night before the whole James gang got shot up they were all staying at Wood’s mother’s house. But the most eerie Hite I’ve encountered in American history is a civil war veteran outlaw prospector named Cass Hite. Edward Abbey at least 2 dozen times in the Monkey Wrench Gang and Desert Solitaire mentions a town called Hite, Utah named for Cass. 


Hite, Utah - now submerged 255 feet beneath Lake Powell is described in an especially foreboding passage of the Monkey Wrench Gang. As Abbey introduces Seldom Seen Smith in chapter 4 he describes the old abandoned gas pumps in Hite being lit by green moonbeams under the black ripples of Lake Powell. Here Abbey enunciates through the voice of Seldom Seen that “Hite will rise again.”

Sharing my last name with a metaphor for uprising struck a personal resonance still panging around my head. But, anyone with a connection to the west as a cultural entity should also feel this reverberation. A ghost was staring at me through the black lines of Abbey’s text. You must understand here that my definition of the word “ghost” is probably different than the one you were thinking of. My definition of “Ghost” parallel’s the epicurean notion of what a spirit is. “Spirit” coming from the Latin word for “breath.” I think of a ghost as the impressions that a living person leaves on the people that are still alive once that person has passed. Edward Abbey has passed and Cass Hite has long passed but their words are still moving through civilization. The words Abbey chose to put down in his books the Monkey Wrench Gang and Desert Solitaire are still pushing, still pushing through time and ink on pages, on me, pushing me forward from Moab through Blanding and Monticello West through Navajo lands on route 95 up to the south shore of Lake Powell. 


Below the boat ramp on the mud flats Pat and I stand in the sun looking out at bouy #295 marking the latitude and longitude of Hite, UT. Standing here in plaid boxer shorts swimming in the icy November water marks the very value of placing names on things, places, ideas, and people. Standing 200 feet below what was until recently Hite marina we see the white waterline now dried on the sandstone revealing the impact seven years of drought has had on Lake Powell. Cement anchors the size of cubicles once used to tether the fueling station and floating restaurant now sit high and dry their massive chain links like sculptures attached to nothing. We bear witness indeed to Hite rising, mother healing herself. 

There is a whole chapter in Desert Solitaire Abbey contemplates the value of naming things. Here he goes back and forth with his travel companion Waterman on the matter as they raft down the Colorado River through Utah. He ultimately concludes in a value for naming things. “We grasp knowledge through naming things” Indeed, one of the most powerful ways to transfer energy through literature is by naming things, calling out names and drawing people to places by descriptions. That is the draw of Ed’s writing. His ability to transport a person from a drab room in a Chicago suburb to floating inches above a prickly pear at the outskirts of Moab or a pinyon pine under a petrified sand arch. Abbey grabs us by the collar inside our stuffy little boxes and places us smack in the middle of the land with mere words. 

I am living the value of naming things, naming places, the reasons are apparent looking out over the lake visiting the National Park ranger who tells me what little he knows about the history of Hite . I was not always of this inclination. I remember standing alongside the road in Ithaca, New York when I was 21. I stood in front of a majestic maple tree in autumn and let the power of that earthly being fill me up. In the middle of this pure moment I was distracted by human activity. I saw a little laminated placard put there by the workers of the Cornell plantations it said Acer shirasawanum named for the maple genus and Shirasa, Japan an indigenous home. As I looked at this piece of meta-information nailed to the tree my first thought was disgust, but looking around I noticed in this arboretum all plants were labeled with their genus and species. Enriched by civilization through the naming process these physical forms take on an enhanced appearance in the mind’s eye. Without the name, the label, it would be just another tree in my malleable memory banks, but because of that label I can go back there anytime and grasp what I had seen. And without the label – Hite – I may not have been moved to make this pilgrimage would not be listening to wind flit off seagulls' wings as they dive into a shallow desert reservoir five hundred miles from home. 

Try to name the sky.

In his books Abbey briefly expounds on his faith, or lack thereof. In Desert Solitaire he longs for a time when people will no longer be debating the existence of God. Where conscious evolution will deliver us to a time past god. A heightened respect of the natural, not a world of A-theism but POST-theism. In these pages I have moved from the ground through the heart and will now move upwards towards the sky. On Sunday night November 8th, 2009 Pat and I were driving in the dark wanting to camp legitimately at the four corners. We planned to wake and make a small homage to the arbitrary cross made by the politically derived intersection. Unfortunately, the gates to the camp grounds had closed at 5PM. Driving three miles past the San Juan River we noticed on the map – Indian route 232. Coming to the turn-off we see it is blocked by a few strands of barbed wire lassoed to a loose fencepost. With no one around we see no reason not to proceed. Up a loose road we travel three miles away from the trucks, their headlights gliding along the blackened flatlands. We set up our small yellow tent quickly and lay out wide awake for hours letting the Milky Way lift us off the ground. I set up my tripod and try to capture a few corners of the vastness above us. Orion jumps out off the eastern horizon and the Pleiades cluster in the center while the arms of the Milky Way wrap around us and our mother. I wonder if the stars will be offended if I take their picture? The arrogance we feel to assume any one of our cultures is more or less important than these indifferent creatures. The stars blast their energy down on us without will or concern for when we eat meat or pray to the east. Punctate balls of energy stars are simultaneously post and pre-theistic. Viewed from the ancestral lands of the Navajo people the sky in its purity and immensity humbles us. Breathing in the sage, nestled amongst the bumps of the desert prairie we lay face up and silent.     ~














This piece of non-fiction was composed in the fall of 2009 after a road trip to the four corners. I originally wrote this for matter journal #13 but was extremely past deadline in my submission. Though some of my photos made it into the journal this bit didn't make the cut. Rather than let it languish on my hard drive I thought with the fall upon us  in the northern hemisphere I'd slap it up here on Tom Paine's Ghost. I hope you like it. And if you don't let me know what you think and how I could improve my writing. Integrating constructive criticism is the best way I can envision any improvement!